High CourtsSingle Bench

Anil Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 15 December 2023 · Citation: (2023) 12 RAJ CK 0054

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kuldeep Mathur, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 8, 18, 29 · Evidence Act, 1872 — Section 27
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7427 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 497 words

Kuldeep Mathur, J

This application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.68/2023, registered at Police Station Sadar Chittorgarh, District Chittorgarh, for offences under Sections 8/18, 8/29 of the NDPS Act.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel submitted that as per the prosecution, the contraband (opium) weighing 5 Kg 90 Gram was recovered from co-accused Sohanlal. Learned counsel submitted that co-accused Sohanlal in his disclosure statement recorded under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act has stated that he had purchased the illicit contraband from the present petitioner. Learned counsel submitted that apart from the disclosure statement of co-accused Sohanlal, there is no other direct / circumstantial evidence available on record indicating involvement of the petitioner in commission of the alleged crime. Learned counsel further submitted that as per prosecution, co-accused Sohanlal and the petitioner were in contact through their mobile phones, however, when the mobile phones of both the accused persons were checked, WhatsApp messenger disclosed that some messages were exchanged inter se between the petitioner and co-accused, however, the language of the messages is innocuous and non-incriminating. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedents. Lastly, it was submitted that investigation against the petitioner has already been completed. The petitioner is in judicial custody since 19.02.2023 and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application.

Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case and after perusing the challan papers, this Court prima facie finds that the petitioner has been implicated in the present case solely on the basis of disclosure statements of co-accused persons. From a careful perusal of the WhatsApp messages exchanged between the petitioner and co-accused attached by the investigating agency with the challan papers, this Court finds that the language of the messages is innocuous and non-incriminating. In this background, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the conditions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act are duly satisfied qua the petitioner, and thus, the petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail.

Consequently, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Anil Kumar S/o Sh. Laldas Beragi arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.68/2023, registered at Police Station Sadar Chittorgarh, District Chittorgarh, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for his appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial.