High CourtsDivision Bench

Anil Kumar vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others.

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 17 May 2024 · Citation: (2024) 05 UK CK 0092

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ritu Bahri, CJ · Rakesh Thapliyal, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (PIL) No. 86 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 88 words

Ritu Bahri, CJ

1.

Counsel for the State has handed over the opinion given by the SDM for carrying out this work. This opinion has been handed over to the counsel for the petitioner.

2.

This PIL is being disposed of at this stage, giving liberty to the petitioner to examine the scientific scope of this opinion, and then take appropriate steps in accordance with law, if so advised.

3.

The Writ Petition (PIL) is, accordingly, disposed of.

4.

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.