High CourtsSingle Bench

Anil Kumar Dhoundiyal & Another vs Rajiv Mehrishi & Another

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 10 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 UK CK 0130

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 378 Of 2017
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 159 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

Petitioners filed Writ Petition (S/S) No. 571 of 2012, which was partly allowed vide judgment dated 20.03.2017 and respondents were directed to

make suitable amendment in the Recruitment and Promotion Rules for providing sufficient promotional avenues to the petitioners. Against the said

judgment, Union of India has filed Special Appeal being Special Appeal No. 816 of 2017.

3.

Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents has apprised the Court that petitioners’ counsel has made a statement

before Division Bench of this Court that he will not press the Contempt Petition till the next date of listing. The said Appeal is still pending before

Division Bench of this Court.

4.

Having regard to the facts of the case, Contempt Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioners to file fresh, if Special Appeal is decided in their

favour. Contempt notices issued against respondents are hereby discharged.