High CourtsSingle Bench

Anil Singh vs District Magistrate, Pithoragarh & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 25 February 2021 · Citation: (2021) 02 UK CK 0096

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Electricity Act, 2003 — Section 127
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 167 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 157 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Petitioner is aggrieved by the assessment made by Executive Engineer, Electricity Distribution Division, Pithoragarh, whereby he was asked to

deposit a sum of Rs. 7,55,010/-. Petitioner is also aggrieved by the recovery citation dated 01.01.2021, issued by Tehsildar, Pithoaragarh.

2.

In the counter affidavit, filed on behalf of respondent no. 2, a preliminary objection has been raised that petitioner has a remedy under Section 127

of the Electricity Act, 2003.

3.

In view of such preliminary objection, writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy with liberty to the petitioner to approach the

Appellate Authority under Section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

4.

It is provided that if petitioner files Appeal under the aforesaid statutory provision within 15 days from today, the same shall be heard and decided

on merits, by ignoring delay.

5.

For a period of 15 days, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner.