High CourtsSingle Bench

Anirudh Prasad Gupta vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 18 October 2019 · Citation: (2019) 10 CHH CK 0140

HON’BLE JUDGES
Goutam Bhaduri, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (S) No. 8594 Of 2019

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 258 words

Goutam Bhaduri, J

1.

The grievance of the petitioner is that the service of the petitioner has been transfered from Government Middle School, Amravatipur, Block

Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur to Government Middle School Chirmi, Block Khadgawan, District Koriya.

2.

It is contended that the petitioner has already served for more than 5 years in one Scheduled District and as per the policy of the State the petitioner

cannot be placed again to a Scheduled District. It is further contended that in place of transfer there is no vacant sanction post of head master exists

and the petitioner is head master. Therefore, the transfer to Koriya itself is against the administrative sanction post of the of the State.

3.

Perused the documents, there is no dispute as to the fact that the petitioner has been transferred to one Scheduled District to other Scheduled

District which would be evident from the list of Scheduled district filled along with the petition.

4.

Considering the fact, it is stated that the petitioner has served for more than 5 years in one Scheduled District. Consequently taking into the policy of

the State as per the circular (Annexure P-2) dated 03.06.2015, the petitioner is given a liberty to make a representation to Respondent No.2, within

two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. If such representation is filed the same may be decided within a further period of 45 days, till

then the transfer order of the petitioner shall not be given effect to.

5.

Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of.