High CourtsSingle Bench

Anish Kumar vs State Of H.P

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 24 November 2020 · Citation: (2020) 11 SHI CK 0201

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ajay Mohan Goel, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 482 · Indian Forest Act, 1927 — Section 41, 42 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 379
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
CRMMO No. 294 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 363 words

Ajay Mohan Goel, J

1.

By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner has challenged order dated 04.10.2016, passed by

the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Baijnath, District Kangra, HP, in FIR No. 94 of 2016, under Sections 41 and 42 of the Indian Forest

Act and Section 379 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station Baijnath, whereby two applications filed by the respective owners

of the vehicles, which stood impounded in the course of investigation of FIR in issue for release thereof, were dismissed. This petition has been filed

by Shri Anish Kumar, who is stated to be owner of vehicle bearing No. HP-68-9469.

2.

I have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Advocate General and gone through the impugned order.

3.

Though, primarily this Court does not finds any irregularity or illegality in the order passed by the learned Court below while dismissing the

application filed by the present petitioner, but, taking into consideration the fact that the impugned order was passed by the learned Court below as far

back as in the year 2016, which now stands assailed by way of this petition in the year 2020, this Court is of the view that it will be in the interest of

justice, in case, vehicle in issue is ordered to be released on sapurdari in favour of the petitioner, post furnishing of sapurdari bond to the tune of

Rs.10,00,000/- (Rs.Ten Lac only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court. Ordered accordingly. As this indulgence

is being shown by the Court to the petitioner by granting relief to him against an order passed by the learned Trial Court in the year 2016, the petitioner

is burdened with cost of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand only), which shall be paid by the petitioner to the Advocates Welfare Fund of Himachal Pradesh

High Court Bar Association. Learned Court below shall issue release order of the vehicle bearing No. HP-68-9469, upon production of receipt of

payment of cost, as imposed by this Court hereinabove, in accordance with law.