High CourtsSingle Bench

Anita Devi vs State Of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 5 March 2021 · Citation: (2021) 03 PAT CK 0066

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 302
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 37605 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 325 words
1.

Heard Ms. Mukul Kumari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Md. Arif, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the

'APP') for the State.

2.

The petitioner is in custody in connection with Kutumba PS Case No. 139 of 2019 dated 22.09.2019, instituted under Sections 302/34 of the Indian

Penal Code.

3.

The allegation against the petitioner, who is the wife of the deceased, is of strangulating him to death along with co-accused, who is husband of the

sister of the petitioner.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that only on suspicion, she has been named and she is totally innocent. It was submitted that the

deceased died due to natural causes and moreover, the FIR has been lodged by the husband of the sister of the deceased and not by any close family

members. It was submitted that the petitioner being a lady is in custody since 23.09.2019 and further that the co-accused has been granted bail by a

co-ordinate Bench.

5.

Learned APP, from the case diary, submitted that the petitioner gave different versions to the informant and to the mother inasmuch as, she had

informed the informant that the deceased was already dead whereas to her mother-in-law, she has stated that the deceased had not come to her

place. It was further submitted that the inquest report clearly states that there was sign of strangulation on the neck which has not been explained by

the petitioner as she was the wife and the deceased was living with her and also died there. It was submitted that the strong suspicion of there being

illicit relationship of the petitioner with co-accused stands corroborated by the circumstances.

6.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the Court is not inclined to enlarge

the petitioner on bail.

7.

Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

8.

However, the Court below shall expedite the trial.