High CourtsDivision Bench

Anita Devi vs Usman Khan

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 11 July 2014 · Citation: (2014) 07 P&H CK 0160

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kiran Anand Lall, Member · Amrit Lal Bahri, President
RESULT
Disposed Off
CASE NUMBER
FAO No. 6249 of 2012
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 182 words
1.

As agreed, as per statement of learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the Insurance Company, separately recorded, a sum of Rs. 6,50,000/- ( Rs. Six Lacs Fifty Thousand Only) over and above the amount awarded by the Tribunal is allowed to the appellants in full and final settlement of the claim. Two months'' time is allowed to the Insurance Company to deposit the amount before the MACT, failing which, interest at the rate of 9% per annum shall follow on this amount till payment from the date of this order. As suggested by learned counsel for the appellants, the enhanced amount would be paid to the appellants by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in the following manner:-

2.

The shares of minor appellants No. 2 to 4 would be deposited in FDRs in their name through their mother/natural guardian, to be payable to them on attaining majority by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.

3.

The appeal is disposed of accordingly.

4.

Copy of the order be supplied/sent to the counsel/parties and file be returned to the High Court.