High CourtsSingle Bench

Anmol Kumar Singh & Anr vs State NCT Of Delhi

Delhi High Court · Decided on 30 October 2018 · Citation: (2018) 10 DEL CK 0406

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 323, 341, 452
RESULT
Disposed Off
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 2006 OF 2017
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

23 paragraphs · 394 words

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

1.

Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.535/2017 under Sections 323/341/452/34 IPC, Police Station New Ashok Nagar.

2.

The allegations in the FIR are that the complainant along with his friends had gone to attend a birthday party. After attending the party at night

when they were coming back one of their friends started vomiting. It is alleged that when he was vomiting, the petitioners came on the spot and

objected to the same. Thereafter, an altercation took place and other friends of the petitioners came on the spot and started assaulting the complainant

and his friends with sticks, on account of which, they sustained injuries.

3.

As per the medical report, the nature of injuries sustained is simple.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated. He further submits that that the subject FIR was a

counterblast to the complaint made by the petitioner against the boys for misbehaving with his family, on which also, an FIR No.595/2017 under

Sections 323/354A/34 IPC, Police Station New Ashok Nagar has been registered.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have since settled their disputes and the complainant has signed a letter in front of the

Investigating Officer.

6.

By order dated 27.09.2017, the petitioners were granted interim protection subject to joining investigation.

7.

Learned APP for the State submits that the petitioner did join investigation and investigation is nearly complete and chargesheet is like to be filed

within four weeks.

8.

Without commenting on the merits of the case and keeping in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and on perusal of the record and also

the fact that the petitioner has been on interim protection since 27.09.2017, I am of the view that the petitioners have made out a case for grant of

anticipatory bail.

9.

Accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest, the arresting officer/IO/SHO shall release the petitioners on bail on petitioners furnishing a bail

bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each with one surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/Investigating Officer/SHO

concerned. Petitioners shall not do anything that may prejudice either the investigation or the prosecution witnesses.

10.

The Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

11.

Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.