High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 02 PAT CK 0284

Anoj Kumar vs State Of Bihar And Ors

Patna High Court · Decided on 20 February 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashutosh Kumar, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1673 Of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 266 words
1.

The petitioner has approached this Court for a direction to the respondents for grant of transport permit which has already been sanctioned in his favour way-back in March, 2019.

2.

It appears from the record that on the request of the petitioner and on his furnishing necessary documents, permit for two of the vehicles belonging to the petitioner for a particular route was sanctioned by the State Transport Authority. The petitioner was thereafter asked to furnish certain documents and enhanced fee, which too was deposited by the petitioner in time. Despite this, no permits are being issued for the two vehicles of the petitioner and the petitioner has not even been communicated any reason for non-grant of such permits.

3.

There appears to be some lack of communication between the petitioner and the respondent/Transport Authority.

4.

Should the petitioner make a suitable representation in this regard, raising the aforesaid issue before the Commissioner, Transport-Cum-Member Secretary, State Transport Authority, Bihar, Patna (respondent No. 3) within a period of three weeks from today, the same shall be looked into by the concerned respondent and a reasoned order shall be passed on such representation within a further period of three weeks thereafter, which order shall be communicated to the petitioner forthwith.

5.

If there is no impediment in grant of permits in favour of the petitioner for the two vehicles belonging to him for a particular route, which has already been sanctioned in the year 2019, necessary arrangement should be made for grant of such permit forthwith.

6.

With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition stands disposed off.