High CourtsSingle Bench

Anoop vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 12 July 2021 · Citation: (2021) 07 KL CK 0157

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shircy V, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 294(b), 323, 324, 341, 354, 427, 452, 506(ii)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Bail Appl. No. 4853 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 338 words

Shircy V, J

1.

Apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.235 of 2021 of Enathu Police Station registered for the offences punishable under Sections 452,

294(b), 341, 323, 324, 354, 506(ii) and 427 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner has moved this application under Section 438 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure.

2.

The prosecution case is that on 24.03.2021 at about 11.30 pm this petitioner along with the other accused have trespassed into the residential house

of the defacto complainant and attacked him with a dangerous weapons such as sticks, piece of tiles etc and caused injuries. When the mother of the

defacto complainant intervened to rescue him, she was also assaulted by the petitioner and the co-accused and she was pushed down and thus she too

sustained injuries. They have also caused damages to the house of the defacto complainant to the tune of Rs.35,000/- and thus committed the

aforesaid offences.

3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations levelled against him are false and baseless. He has been falsely implicated in the

case at the instance of the defacto complainant. Still he apprehends arrest and hence this application.

4.

The learned Public Prosecutor on instruction submits that now the investigation of the case is over and charge sheet has been filed before the

jurisdictional magistrate.

Having regard to the nature of the accusation levelled against this petitioner as well the fact that the investigation of the case is over and he is aged

only 19 years having no criminal antecedents, I think that this application can be disposed of directing him to surrender before the jurisdictional

magistrate and seek regular bail. Therefore, he is directed to surrender before the jurisdictional magistrate on 16.07.2021 at 11.00 am. If a bail

application is moved by him, the jurisdictional Magistrate shall dispose of the same on the very same day on merits in accordance with law, considering

the fact that he has no criminal backgrounds and is aged only 19 years.