High CourtsDivision Bench

Anoop Pandey vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 22 September 2022 · Citation: (2022) 09 UK CK 0121

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vipin Sanghi, CJ · Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (S/B) No. 328 Of 2013
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 188 words

Vipin Sanghi, CJ

1) The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to seek the following substantial reliefs:

“i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to promote him on the post of Executive Engineer (Civil) from the date his juniors have been promoted.

ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay salary and all other benefits of the post of Executive Engineer to the petitioner from the date his juniors have been promoted to the post of Executive Engineer.”

2) The petitioner is a public servant. The substantial reliefs sought by the petitioner squarely fall for consideration within the jurisdiction of the Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal.

3) Considering the fact that the petition is pending since the year 2013, we direct the Registry to transmit the complete record of the case to the Tribunal, which shall be registered as a claim petition by the Tribunal, and be dealt with accordingly. Considering the age of the case, the Tribunal is requested to expedite its hearing.

4) Writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.