CourtKutchehry.com
High CourtsSingle Bench

Anshuman Bajaj vs State of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 15 February 2011 · Citation: (2011) 02 P&H CK 0163

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Singh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 406, 438(2), 498A, 506
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-26524 of 2009 (O and M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 172 words

Alok Singh, J.—This is a petition seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 752 dated 22.11.2008, u/s 498A, 406, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Central, Faridabad.

2.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner has been enlarged on bail pursuant to the directions issued by this Court dated 23.09.2009 and he has joined the investigation.

3.

Learned Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, on the instructions of ASI Satbir Singh, states that the Petitioner has joined the investigation.

4.

Learned Counsel for the complainant has opposed the bail application. He states that dowry articles have not been recovered, hence, custodial interrogation is must.

5.

There is a dispute about the dowry articles. As to how much dowry was given can not be decided at the stage of investigation.

6.

Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, present petition is allowed. Order dated 23.09.2009 is made absolute, subject to the limitations provided u/s 438(2) of the Code. Petitioner-accused shall participate in the investigation as and when he is required.