High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 09 MP CK 0297

Antar S/O Surbhan Bamaniya vs State Of Madhya Pradesh And Victim / Prosecutrix)

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 30 September 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.K. Awasthi, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 28989 Of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 444 words

This first application under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 has been filed by applicant, who is implicated in connection with Crime No.73/2020 registered at Police Station Sanawad, District Khargone (MP) for offence punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376 and 376 (2) (n) / 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and also under Section 3 read with Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012.

The applicant is in custody since 29.02.2020.

As per prosecution case, on the basis of the allegations made by the prosecutrix regarding abduction, inducement and commission of rape on the pretext of marriage, the case has been registered against the present applicant.

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is a young boy aged about 20 years and he has not committed any offence. It is further submitted that although the prosecutrix is a minor girl aged about 16 years, however, according to her statement recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, she had gone with the applicant and returned back. In the aforesaid statement, she has not made any allegation against the applicant regarding commission of rape. The applicant is in custody since 29.02.2020. The investigation is over and charge sheet has already been filed. There is no possibility of his / her absconsion or tampering with the evidence, if enlarged on bail. Conclusion of the trial will take sufficiently long time. Under these circumstances, learned counsel for the applicant prays for grant of bail to the applicant.

Learned Panel Lawyer for the non-applicant / State of Madhya Pradesh opposes the bail application by contending that no sufficient ground is made out for releasing the applicant on bail; hence he / she prayed for rejection of the application.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, but without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the application filed by the applicant is allowed. The applicant is directed to be released on bail upon his / her furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court, for his / her regular appearance before the trial Court during trial with a condition that he / she shall remain present before the Court concerned during trial and shall also abide by the conditions enumerated under Section 437 (3) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.

This order shall be effective till the end of the trial, however, in case of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.

Certified copy, as per rules.