High CourtsSingle Bench

Anu Bala vs Rajinder Kumar

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 9 January 2007 · Citation: (2007) 4 PLR 620 : (2007) 4 RCR(Civil) 66

HON’BLE JUDGES
Viney Mittal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Section 9
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 189 words

Viney Mittal, J.—The wife is petitioner before this Court. She has prayed that a petition filed by the petitioner u/s 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act pending in the Court at Jalandhar be transferred to Ferozepur inasmuch as, some other litigations are pending between the parties at Ferozepur Court.

2.

Shri Ashok Aneja, the learned Counsel appearing for the husband respondent does not dispute the fact that the some other litigation is already pending between the parties at Ferozepur.

3.

Keeping in view the aforesaid fact and also keeping in view the convenience of the petitioner wife, I direct that the proceedings in the petition filed by the respondent husband u/s 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act and pending before the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Jalandhar shall stand transferred to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Ferozepur.

4.

The parties shall appear before the learned District Judge, Ferozepur on March 5, 2007. The learned District Judge, Ferozepur shall allocate the aforesaid proceedings to the Court of competent jurisdiction.

5.

The present petition is consequently disposed of.

A copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges.