AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
29 paragraphs · 548 wordsThis petition is filed under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
The petitioner herein is the accused in Crime No.2099/2017 of the Museum Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram, registered under sections 354,
506(i) and 376 of the Indian Penal Code.
The victim in the instant case is a girl aged 18 years and is doing her first year degree course. According to the victim, the petitioner herein is her
neighbour. Both the families were pretty close to each other. The allegation is that on 01.12.2017, the petitioner offered the victim a lift in his car
and after showing some obscene videos subjected her to sexual assault. It is further alleged that on 19.12.2017 at about 10.30 PM, while the
victim was standing in the terrace of her house, the petitioner came there stealthily and subjected her to penetrative sexual assault.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is a married man and due to a minor dispute between the two
families, false allegations are now levelled. The victim had refused medical examination by a doctor when she was taken for examination. This
would make her version suspect is the submission of the learned counsel. Finally, it is submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody from
30.12.2017 and prays for his release.
The learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the submissions advanced by the learned counsel.
I have considered the submissions and have gone through the case diary. It appears that after furnishing the F.I. Statement on 29.12.2017, the
victim was examined by Dr. Hridya Bhaskar at the Women and Child Hospital at Thycaud and as is evidenced by Annexure-2 report, the victim
refused from being examined for sexual assault. The Doctor has reported that no opinion can be given as the examination was not done. The
advantage, in the facts and circumstances, will have to be extended to the petitioner who has been in custody from 30.12.2017. Further more, the
investigation also has progressed considerably.
In the result, this petition will stand allowed. However, it shall be subject to the following conditions:
A) The petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for
the like sum to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction.
B) The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer on all Saturdays between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m., for two months or till final report is
filed, whichever is earlier.
C) The petitioner shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses; nor shall he tamper with the evidence. He shall not make any attempt to
contact the victim or her family members.
D) The petitioner shall surrender his passport before the court below or if he does not have one, he shall file affidavit to that effect within five days
of his release. Application for release of the passport, if any, shall be considered by the trial court at the appropriate stage.
E) The petitioner shall not commit any offence while he is on bail.
In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the jurisdictional Court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation, if any,
and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.
