High CourtsDivision Bench(2022) 03 DEL CK 0036

Anuj Goel (Proprietor Of M/S Goel Trading Company) vs Commissioner CGST Delhi East Commissionerate & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 8 March 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manmohan, J · Sudhir Kumar Jain, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 3696, 3697 Of 2022, Civil Miscellaneous No. 10967, 10970 Of 2022

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 202 words

Manmohan, J

1.

Present writ petitions have been filed seeking directions to the Respondents to release/de-freeze the bank accounts of the Petitioners that had been provisionally attached by the Respondents vide orders dated 10th September, 2020 and 11th September, 2020.

2.

On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the Respondents had sought time to obtain instructions.

3.

Today Mr.Harpreet Singh, learned standing counsel for the Respondent states that no fresh DRC-22 notices have been issued against the Petitioners.  He also clarifies that the State GST has issued notices under Section 74 of the Delhi GST Act to the Petitioners.

4.

Admittedly, after issuance of the impugned orders/letters, no fresh attachment order has been issued to the Petitioners.  According to Section 83(2) of the CGST Act, every provisional attachment order ceases to have effect after the expiry of one year from the date the order was passed under Section 83(1) of the CGST Act.  Consequently, the impugned provisional attachment order/letter is no longer effective.

5.

Accordingly, this Court directs the Respondents to defreeze the bank accounts of the Petitioners not later than three days from today. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petitions along with pending applications stand disposed of.