High CourtsSingle Bench

Anuj Kumar & others vs State of Uttarakhand & others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 29 November 2017 · Citation: (2017) 11 UK CK 0059

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sudhanshu Dhulia
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
<a href=1767>Indian Penal Code, 1860</a>, <a href=1767-120B>Section 120B</a>, <a href=1767-420>Section 420</a>, <a href=1767-468>Section 468</a>, <a href=1767-471>Section 471</a>, <a href=1767-467>Section 467</a>, <a href=1767-506>Section 506</a>, <a href=1767-406>Section 406</a>, <a href=1767-504>Section 504</a>, <a href=1767-507>Section 507</a> - Punishment of criminal conspiracy - Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property - Forgery for purpose of cheating - Using as genuine a forged document - Forgery of valuable security, will, etc - Punishment for criminal ,intimidation - Punishment for Criminal breach of trust - Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace - Criminal intimidation by an anonymous communication
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
1927 of 2017
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 103 words
1.

Mr. Bharat Singh, Advocate, present for the petitioners.

2.

Mr. Lalit Miglani, Brief Holder, present for the State/respondent Nos.1 & 2.

3.

The First Information Report has been lodged by respondent No. 3 which has been registered as Case Crime No.454 of 2017, under Sections 406/420/467/468/471/504/506/507/120B of IPC, at Police Station- Manglour, District-Haridwar implicating the present petitioners. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have approached this Court for relief.

4.

Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of offence, no interference is being called for by this Court in the matter.

5.

Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed.