High CourtsSingle Bench

Anupama Tripathi vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 24 September 2018 · Citation: (2018) 09 CHH CK 0336

HON’BLE JUDGES
P. Sam Koshy, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (S) No. 6266 Of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 211 words

P. Sam Koshy, J

1.

Grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is the order of transfer, dated 10.9.2018, Annexure P-1, which has been issued against the

petitioner.

2.

The petitioner being a lady has been sent from Pendra, District Bilaspur to Sankargarh, District Balrampur.

3.

The only substantive ground raised by the petitioner in the present case is that the spouse of the petitioner is also a Lecturer of Maths subject and is

posted at Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Gourela, District Bilaspur.

4.

According to the petitioner, the transfer policy itself has a clause where the authorities concerned would have to consider the case of transferring of

a person whose spouse is in government employment as far as possible in the same station.

5.

Given the said facts, let the petitioner make a detailed representation in this regard in addition to the representation which he has already made,

within a period of 10 days from today. Let respondents no. 1 and 2 take a decision on the said representation at the earliest preferably within a period

of two months.

6.

Meanwhile, the impugned order of transfer shall not be given effect to so far as the petitioner is concerned.

7.

The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.