High CourtsDivision Bench

Anwar Ahmad vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 12 June 2026 · Citation: (2026) 06 UK CK 0669

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Gupta, CJ · Subhash Upadhyay, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (PIL) No. 77 Of 2026
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 159 words

Manoj Kumar Gupta, CJ

1.

The present writ petition has been filed in public interest praying for a direction to respondent nos.1 to 4 to remove the encroachments made by the private respondents over Khasra No. 1290 area 0.203 hectare, recorded as rasta, and in Khasra No.1082, recorded under category 6(4) (Khanti) (Government land), area 0.278 hectare, and restore the pathway for use of public at large.

2.

Learned State Counsel has placed on record the instructions received from Tehsildar, Rudrapur. According to it, a Committee has been constituted for carrying out demarcation at the site and it is stated that after said exercise is over, if any encroachment is found, it would be removed.

3.

In view of the fact that the official respondents are already examining the matter, no further direction is required to be issued except for the observations that appropriate action be taken strictly in accordance with law and, in case, any encroachment is found.