High CourtsSingle Bench

Anwar Ansari vs State Of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 9 October 2020 · Citation: (2020) 10 JH CK 0037

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anil Kumar Choudhary, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 379 · Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1987 — Section 4, 21 · Jharkhand Mineral (Prevention Transportation And Storage) Rule, 2017 — Rule 9, 13 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
CASE NUMBER
A.B.A. No.4835 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 393 words

Heard the parties through video conferencing. Mr. Kumar Nilesh- learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown is over.

In view of personal undertaking given by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present.

Apprehending his arrest in connection with East Tundi P.S. Case No.37 of 2020 instituted under Sections 379 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 4/54 of JMMCR, 2004, Section 4/21 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1987 and Section 9/13 of the Jharkhand Mineral (Prevention Transportation and Storage) Rule, 2017, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in illegal extraction of stones by illegal blasting. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.

Learned A.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Dhanbad within eight weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.20,000/-(Rupees twenty thousand) as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with East Tundi P.S. Case No.37 of 2020 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.