Supreme CourtFull Bench

APARBAL YADAVVs STATE OF U P & ORS

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 10 April 2018 · Citation: (2018) 4 JT 236 : (2018) 6 Scale 165 : (2018) 5 SCC 363 : (2018) 2 SCC (L&S) 33

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kurian Joseph, Mohan M Shantanagoudar, Navin Sinha
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No 3695 of 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 372 words

Kurian Joseph, J.

[1] Leave granted.

[2] The appellant is affected to the extent that the Division Bench of the High Court has interfered with the interim arrangement made by the learned

Single Judge during the pendency of the writ petition with regard to payment of salary. Taking note of the long service rendered by the appellant, the

learned Single Judge passed the following order, on 31.08.2017:-

...Stopping salary of a teacher, who is continuously working for last thirty years, only on the basis of doubt is not justified. Accordingly, the impugned

order dated 25th January, 2012 stopping the salary of the petitioner is stayed.

[3] It appears, that the Division Bench, without considering the background of the case and the reasons which compelled the learned Single Judge to

pass the order, directed the writ petition to be finally disposed of expeditiously, but modifying the interim order of the learned Single Judge to the effect

that the status as was prevailing on the date of filing of the writ petition was to be maintained. It is not in dispute that as on the date of filing of the writ

petition, the appellant was without salary on account of the impugned orders.

[4] Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we see no justification at all for the Division Bench to take such a view. After all, the appellant

has been working since 1987 and was drawing salary till the impugned orders were passed in the year 2012.

[5] In the above circumstances, the impugned judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court, to the extent it modified the interim order passed by

the learned Single Judge, is set aside and the appeal is, accordingly, allowed. The interim arrangement made by the learned Single Judge by order

dated 31.08.2017 shall continue to operate till the disposal of the writ petition. The arrears of salary shall be released within a period of one month

from today.

[6] The writ petition may be disposed of on its own merits, uninfluenced by the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court or of this Court.

[7] Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

[8] There shall be no orders as to costs.