AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
8 paragraphs · 178 wordsRavindra Maithani, J
Applicant Aradhana Sharma is in judicial custody in Case Crime No.238 of 2023, under Section 2/3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Rajpur, District-Dehraun. She has sought her release on bail.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that out of 5 of the cases, based on which the instant FIR has been lodged, the applicant is in bail in 2 of such cases, and in three of the cases, the applicant has never been apprehended; she is not a previous convict.
These facts are admitted by learned State Counsel.
Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant be released on bail, on her executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.