AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
13 paragraphs · 512 wordsViju Abraham, J
This is an application for regular bail.
Petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.626 of 2022 of Valappad Police Station, Thrissur registered alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 341, 324, 294(b) and 308 of the IPC.
The prosecution case is that, on 12.09.2022 at 21.30 hours, the applicant out of previous enmity, wrongfully restrained the defacto complainant and abused him in filthy language. Thereafter, the applicant voluntarily caused hurt to the defacto complainant and his friends by beating with an iron pipe. The act of the applicant in attempting to beat on the head of the defacto complainant with iron pipe would have resulted in his death, if not prevented. On such allegations, the aforesaid crime was registered.
Petitioner submits that he has been falsely implicated in the above said crime and he is in custody from 14.09.2022 onwards and his further detention is not required for the purpose of investigation. In fact, what has happened is that on 12.09.2022 while the petitioner was driving a car bearing Reg.No.KL-47-J-2000, a road traffic accident occurred when it hit against a motor cycle. The petitioner along with other persons including the defacto complainant took the injured persons to the hospital. Later the petitioner want to take his vehicle, the defacto complainant and three others attacked him and he sustained injuries. A complaint was filed and a crime was registered as Crime No.627/2022 of Valappad Police Station against the defacto complainant and his friends and the present crime was registered on a false complaint by the defacto complainant.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.
Learned Public Prosecutor seriously opposed the application for bail mainly contending that the defacto complainant attacked the petitioner with an iron pipe and he sustained injuries in the alleged incident, but submitted that the petitioner has no other criminal antecedents.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of the allegation, and the petitioner is in custody from 14.09.2022 onwards, and that the petitioner has no other criminal antecedents, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, but on stringent conditions. In the result, the bail application is allowed. It is directed that the petitioner shall be released on bail, subject to the following conditions:
(i) The petitioner shall execute bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like-sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court;
(ii) Petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer in Crime 626 of 2022 of Valappad Police Station on every Saturday at 11 am, until filing of final report;
(iii) The petitioner shall not attempt to interfere with the investigation or to influence any witness in the above said crime;
(iv) The petitioner shall not involve in any other crime while on bail.
If any of the aforesaid conditions are violated, the investigating officer in Crime No. 626 of 2022 of Valappad Police Station may file an application before the jurisdictional court, for cancellation of bail.
