High CourtsSingle Bench

Arbaaz S/o Mohammad Yamin vs Sajda Parveen

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 22 October 2021 · Citation: (2021) 10 UK CK 0088

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Kumar Verma, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 — Section 25
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Revision No. 78 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 236 words

Alok Kumar Verma,J

1.

This revision has been filed under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 against the judgment and decree dated 24.08.2020, passed by the learned Judge, Small Cause Court/ 1st Additional District Judge, Haldwani in S.C.C. Suit No. 29 of 2018 "Smt. Sajda Parveen Vs. Arbaaz", whereby the said suit was decreed for eviction of the revisionist/defendant, arrears of rent and damages for use of occupation.

2.

During the pendency of this revision, the parties entered into a lawful compromise.

3.

A compromise application (IA 9809 of 2021) dated 08.10.2021, duly signed by the learned counsel for both the parties along with compromise deed dated 19.09.2021, Annexure No. 1, and affidavits of the parties have been filed before this Court.

4.

According to the compromise, the revisionist has evicted and handed over the vacant possession of the shop-in-question to the respondent and amount of rent and mesne profit, as directed by the learned trial court, has been relinquished by the respondent.

5.

The learned counsel for the parties submitted that the said compromise has been filed with free will of both the parties and without any pressure, misrepresentation or fraud.

6.

Accordingly, the revision is hereby disposed of in terms of the compromise. The compromise, filed before this Court, shall be the part of decree. Registry is hereby directed to draw a decree accordingly.

7.

No order as to costs.