High CourtsSingle Bench

Arbind Kumar vs State Of Jharkhand And Others

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 11 June 2021 · Citation: (2021) 06 JH CK 0019

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. S.N.Pathak, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (S) No. 4658 Of 2019

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 220 words

Dr. S.N.Pathak, J

 The petitioner has approached this Court for direction upon the respondents to hold and declare that petitioner is entitled to get the sanction and

benefit of third M.A.C.P., and consequently for issuance of revised pay slip as per seventh Pay Revision and payment of pension and other retiral

benefits with 18% interest.

At the very outset, it has been submitted by Mr. Mrinal Kanti Roy that grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed as he has received the

benefit of 3rd M.A.C.P. However, respondents have not certified the service book and issued the pay slip due to which the petitioner is facing

problem in getting the post retiral benefits.

On the other hand, Ms. Shivani Kapoor, learned Counsel representing the respondent-State submits that if the petitioner approaches the respondent-

authorities his grievances shall also be redressed.

In view of the submissions of the parties, the petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation regarding certification of service book and issuance of

pay slip before the respondent No.1 within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Upon receipt of representation the

respondent No.1 shall consider the representation of the petitioner sympathetically and pass order within a period of two weeks thereafter.

The writ petition stands disposed of.