High CourtsSINGLE BENCH

Arbind Kumar Sharma vs The State of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 1 May 2017 · Citation: (2017) 05 PAT CK 0005

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sudhir Singh
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
19495 of 2016

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

26 paragraphs · 254 words
1.

I.A. No. 1695 of 2007 has been filed by the Intervenor

Deepeka Devi to implead her as Respondent No. 6.

2.

Let the Intervenor be impleaded as Respondent No. 6.

Corrections be made accordingly.

3.

Inter alia contending that there is illegal encroachment

on Government land bearing Khata No. 422, Khesra No. 355, Thana

No. 31, area- 6? decimal situated at Village- Sakshmipur Shivnar,

District- Patna and inspite of complaint, the same is not being

removed, this petition has been filed in public interest.

4.

However, the intervenor has brought on record

proceedings pending in Title Suit No. 168 of 2009 and she claims that

she is title owner of the property in question and has filed a suit which

has been disposed of and decree is in her favour.

5.

Taking note of the totality of the circumstances and the

materials available on record, particularly the assertion made by the

intervenor Smt. Deepika Devi, it is not appropriate for us to make any

indulgence in the matter exercising our extraordinary jurisdiction

under Article 226 of the Constitution and direct for removal of

encroachment, particularly when the decree is in favour of the

intervenor. In case petitioner has any grievance with regard to

encroachment, he has got statutory remedy of approaching the

statutory authority under the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act.

6.

Accordingly, granting liberty to the petitioner to take

recourse to the statutory remedy of approaching the statutory authority

under the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, the writ petition

stands disposed of.