Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench

Archana Choudhary Vs Nahak Motors Pvt. Ltd

National Company Law Tribunal · Decided on 11 December 2023 · Citation: (2023) 12 NCLT CK 0039

HON’BLE JUDGES
Harnam Singh Thakur, Member (J) · Subrata Kumar Dash, Member (T)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
CP(IB) No. 253/Chd/Hry/2022

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 149 words

Mr. Raghav Kapoor, Advocate for the Petitioner-Operational Creditor.

It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has no instructions to appear on behalf of the petitioner-operational creditor and he may be permitted to withdraw his vakalatnama, he may do so. It is seen that the present petition was filed last year, i.e. September 2022, and vide order dated 21.09.2022, learned counsel for the petitioner was directed to make compliance for clearly mentioning the date of default and also the compliance of declaration given at page No. 88 with respect to submissions of Form GSTR-1 and Form GSTR 3B, but even on today, no compliance has been made, despite two opportunities were granted in addition to the cost imposed of Rs. 5,000/-. In these circumstances, it seems that the petitioner is not interested to proceed with the present petition, hence the present petition is dismissed in default.