High CourtsDivision Bench(1908) 02 BOM CK 0002

Ardeshir Mancherji Kharadi vs Assistant Collector

Bombay High Court · Decided on 24 February 1908 · Citation: (1908) 10 BOMLR 517

HON’BLE JUDGES
Heaton, J · Chandavarhar, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Appeal No. 77 of 1907

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 104 words

Chandavarkar, J.—We think we must allow the preliminary objection raised for respondent No. 1 that no appeal lies. Several issues were raised before the District Judge but he has disposed of only three of them which deal with the question of the gross sum payable as compensation. But the question has yet to be determined to whom the amount so determined must be paid, and until that is determined, it cannot be said that there is a final award as contemplated by the Act, against which alone an appeal can be preferred. On these grounds we dismiss the appeal with separate sets of costs.