High CourtsSingle Bench

Arif Ahmad vs State & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 13 May 2019 · Citation: (2019) 05 DEL CK 0071

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sunil Gaur, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Electricity Act, 2003 — Section 135 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 482
RESULT
Disposed Off
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 2552 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 331 words

Quashing of FIR No. 781/2017 under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, registered at police station Jamia Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of No Dues Certificate of 7th May, 2019 issued by respondent No.2/complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question.

Mr. Izhar Ahmad, learned Additional Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State.

Mr. Sunil Fernandis, Advocate, appears on behalf of respondent No.2 and submits that the subject matter of this FIR stands amicably resolved between the parties and No Dues Certificate has been already issued by respondent No.2/complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and so, the proceedings arising out of the FIR in question be brought to an end.

Supreme Court in Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Vs. State of Gujarat (2017) 9 SCC 641 has reiterated the parameters for exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR/criminal proceedings, which are as under:-

"16.7. As distinguished from serious offences, there may be criminal cases which have an overwhelming or predominant element of a civil dispute. They stand on a distinct footing insofar as the exercise of the inherent power to quash is concerned.

16.8. Criminal cases involving offences which arise from commercial, financial, mercantile, partnership or similar transactions with an essentially civil flavour may in appropriate situations fall for quashing where parties have settled the dispute.

16.9. In such a case, the High Court may quash the criminal proceeding if in view of the compromise between the disputants, the possibility of a conviction is remote and the continuation of a criminal proceeding would cause oppression and prejudice."

Since the subject matter of this FIR now stands mutually and amicably settled between parties, therefore, continuance of proceedings arising out of the FIR in question would be an exercise in futility.

Accordingly, FIR No. 781/2017 under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003 registered at police station Jamia Nagar, Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed qua petitioner.

This petition is accordingly disposed of.