High CourtsDivision Bench

Arjun vs State of Rajasthan and Others

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 15 April 2011 · Citation: (2011) 04 RAJ CK 0030

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dinesh Maheshwari, J · C.M. Totla, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 97, 98
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 3197 of 2011
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 147 words
1.

The Petitioner, said to have contracted marriage with Ms. Durga daughter of Pema Ram Ji Patel on 28.01.2011, has filed this petition seeking writ in the nature of habeas corpus with the submissions that Ms. Durga was kidnapped by the private Respondents on 27.02.2011 and since then, she is missing and no information whatsoever has been communicated to him.

2.

From the submissions as made in the writ petition, it is not seen if the Petitioner has taken recourse to the ordinary remedy available in law, particularly with reference to Sections 97 and 98 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

3.

Having regard to the circumstances, though we find no reason to entertain this petition for habeas corpus but leave it open for the Petitioner to take recourse to the appropriate remedy in accordance with law.

4.

With the observations aforesaid, this writ petition stands rejected.