High CourtsSingle Bench

Arjun Bihari vs State Of Odisha And Another

Orissa High Court · Decided on 18 October 2023 · Citation: (2023) 10 OHC CK 0125

HON’BLE JUDGES
Savitri Ratho, J
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 11605 Of 2023

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 245 words

Savitri Ratho, J

1.

Since this is a case under Sections 363, 366, 376 (2) (n),506 of IPC read with Section 4 (2)/6 read with Section 5 (1)/5 (n) of the POCSO Act, it is necessary to issue notice to the father of the victim, who has been impleaded as opposite party No.2 in this case.

2.

Issue notice. Notice on behalf of the opposite party no.1 is accepted by Mr.D.K.Mishra, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate by registered post with A.D., requisites for which shall be filed within three working days. The notice shall be made returnable within four weeks.

3.

List this matter on 06.12.2023.

4.

Mr. Banji, learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve an extra copy of the brief on learned counsel for the State within three days, for sending the same to the informant through the IIC, Chandili P.S.

5.

Mr.D.K.Mishra, learned Addl. Government Advocate is directed to inform the concerned I.O./I.I.C. to intimate the opposite party No.2 that the case is posted to 06.12.2023 and in case he cannot engage an advocate, he can appear through video conferencing mode from the Police Station or the Virtual High Court at Rayagada on the next date for opposing the bail application.

6.

Mr.Mishra, learned Addl. Government Advocate is directed to obtain the case diary alongwith the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. as well as the written instructions regarding service of notice to the opposite party No.2.

……………………………