Arjun Singh vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Learned counsel for the State is heard.

The petitioner has filed this first application u/S. 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of bail.

The petitioner has been arrested on 18/9/2019 by Police Station Bijoli, District Gwalior (M.P.) in connection with Crime No.165/19, registered in relation to the offence punishable u/S. 306/34 IPC.

Learned Public Prosecutor for the State opposed the application and prayed for its rejection by contending that on the basis of the allegations and the material available on record, no case for grant of bail is made out.

The petitioner is uncle of the deceased Sandhya who was 16 years old girl and was found hanging from a tree in the agricultural field near the village alongwith other deceased Arun aged 19 years.

The complainant is the father of the deceased Arun who alleges that petitioner has abetted his son to commit suicide.

Prosecution story discloses that deceased Sandhya on the fateful night disappeared from home without informing her parents and later on bodies of both the deceased namely, Arun and Sandhya were found hanging from a tree. Prosecution story further discloses that there was love and affairs between both the deceased which was objected to by their parents resulting an unnatural death of deceased. It is seen that the cause of death is that both the deceased were piqued by the attitude of their respective parents of not allowing them to meet which persuaded both the deceased to commit suicide.

Though the incident is very unfortunate but considering the fact that petitioner has also lost their niece who is minor and cannot prima be blamed directly for abetting the deceased to commit suicide, live and proximate lind between the cause and suicide appears to be weak.

In similar facts, parents of the deceased Sandhya have been admitted to bail by this court by order dated 1/10/2019 in Mcrc 40911/19 and the case of present petitioner is not distinguishable from the case of above said co-accused in Mcrc. 40911/19.

Considering the above facts and that early conclusion of the trial is bleak possibility and prolonged pre-trial detention is anathema to the concept of liberty and the material placed on record does not disclose possibility of the petitioner fleeing from justice, this Court is inclined to extend the benefit of bail to the petitioner but with certain stringent condition in view of pending investigation.

Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand only) with two solvent sureties each of Rs. 25,000/-to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court.

This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the petitioner :-

The petitioner will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;

The petitioner will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

The petitioner will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused;

The petitioner will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and

The petitioner will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.

The petitioner shall mark his presence at concerned police station once every week till conclusion of investigation.

The petitioner shall plant 25 saplings of indigenous fruit bearing or

shady trees on the side of the road/street of the place of residence of petitioners or at any other place in the district which is earmarked by the Collector/Revenue Authority for planting trees and shall take care of the trees for the next one year by watering the plants and by installing tree guards at his own expenses. In case the petitioners are unable to afford incurring of such expenses, then he would obtain saplings/tree guard from the forest authorities (the concerned Forest Range Officer of the area) free of cost or at concessional/nominal rates available under any beneficial scheme of the Government. The petitioner shall file an affidavit disclosing compliance of this condition within 30 days in the Registry, failing which this court may consider cancellation of bail.

On complying with Condition No.8 aforesaid, the petitioner is directed to inform the location of plantation made to the Forest Rang Officer of the area concerned who will pass on this information to the DFO concerned.

For effective implementation of this order in the interest of betterment of ecology of the area concerned, the District Magistrate of district within which the petitioner resides is directed to assist the petitioner/accused to comply with condition No.8 by extending all possible financial and material assistance to the petitioner admissible under any of the beneficial scheme for afforestation of the State.

The DFO of the concerned District is directed to file verification report before the trial Court concerned after carrying out inspection personally or through any other officer of the Forest Dept duly authorised in that behalf disclosing as to whether petitioner has complied with condition No.8 or not, and if yes to what extent?

The learned trial Judge on receiving report of noncompliance of condition No.8 shall forthwith communicate the same to the Registry of this Court.

The Registry on receiving any such report from the trial Court disclosing default shall put up the matter before appropriate Bench in shape of PUD.

A copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for compliance.

Let a typed copy of this order be also supplied to the counsel for the State for compliance of the aforesaid directives.

A copy of this order be furnished by the Registry of this court to the concerned District Magistrate and the DFO having territorial jurisdiction over the place of residence of the petitioner for execution of the order in the interest of the ecology.

For the time being this case stands disposed of.

C.c. as per rules.