AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
5 paragraphs · 107 words1.
It is contended before us that the third defendant ought to have been made a party to the appeal u/s 85 of the transfer of Property Act. But the
suit is not one under the provisions of Chapter IV of the Transfer of Property Act. It is not a suit for foreclosure, sale or redemption. It is in
ejectment. We are of opinion that Section 85 of the Transfer of Property Act does not apply to such suits. See Ram Narain Ram v. Palu Patak 1
A.L.J.R. 367. No other question of law arise on the facts found.
2.
We dismiss the second appeal with costs.