High CourtsSingle Bench

Arshad Mirchi vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 6 August 2020 · Citation: (2020) 08 RAJ CK 0053

HON’BLE JUDGES
Pankaj Bhandari, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 392
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8535 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 227 words
1.

Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.

2.

F.I.R. No. 294/2020 was registered at Police Station Kunhadi, Kota City(Raj.) for offence under Sections 392 and 34 of I.P.C.

3.

It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is not having any criminal antecedents. It is also contended that petitioner is a young boy aged 20 years.

4.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

5.

I have considered the contentions.

6.

Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the petitioner, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.

7.

This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

8.

A copy of this order be sent to concerned S.H.O. for recording this condition in the Village Crime Record Book so that in the event of petitioner's repeating offence, S.H.O. can move the Court for cancellation of bail.