High CourtsSingle Bench

Arun vs State Of MP & Another

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 6 January 2022 · Citation: (2022) 01 MP CK 0030

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vijay Kumar Shukla, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 363, 366, 376(2)(n), 376(3) · Protection Of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 5(L), 6 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 164
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.24753 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 435 words

Vijay Kumar Shukla, J

This is first application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of the applicant in connection with Crime No.5/2021 registered at Police

Station Civil Line, Dewas under Section 366, 363, 376(3), 376(2)(n) of the IPC and Sec.5(L)/6 of POCSO Act.

Learned counsel for applicant submits that from reading the statement of the prosecutrix u/S.164 Cr.P.C, it is clear that she was a consenting party.

She has also married the present applicant. The date of birth recorded in Aadhar Card is 5/10/2003 and she was major on the date of the incident.

Counsel for State submits that the age of the prosecutrix as per the school scholar register is 11/5/2006 and, therefore, she was minor on the date of

the incident.

However, taking into consideration the totality of facts of the case and the statement of the prosecutrix and also the fact that in the Aadhar Card the

date of birth is recorded of year 2003 and the parents have also disclosed the different dates in their statements, I am of the view that the applicant is

entitled for grant of bail. Therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, the application is allowed.

It is directed that Applicant Arun shall be released from custody upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty thousand Only) with one

surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court below.

The prison authorities are also requested to ensure compliance with the order passed by the Supreme Court IN RE : CONTAGION OF COVID 19

VIRUS IN PRISONS in SUO MOTU ""W.P. (C) No.1/2020"" and ensure that the applicant is examined by the jail doctor before his release. If the

applicant shows symptoms of COVID-19, the doctor shall forthwith direct him to be produced before the appropriate hospital designated for the

detection and treatment of COVID-19 patients. If the doctor is of the opinion that the applicant is not affected with the virus, the jail authorities shall

ensure his transportation from the jail till his place of residence.

It is further made clear that if it is found that the applicant is involved in any other case during the trial, this bail order shall stand cancelled

automatically without reference to the Court and the Police will be at liberty to arrest the applicant.

A typed copy of this order be forwarded by the Registry to the office of the Advocate General, on their email address, for intimation to the Police

Station concerned. The office is requested to forward a copy of this order to the learned Court below.