High CourtsSingle Bench

Arun Kumar vs State of Uttarakhand and others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 28 April 2017 · Citation: (2017) 04 UK CK 0047

HON’BLE JUDGES
V.K. Bist
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
<a href=1767>Indian Penal Code, 1860</a>, <a href=1767-498A>Section 498A</a>, <a href=1767-506>Section 506</a>, <a href=1767-504>Section 504</a>, <a href=1767-354A>Section 354A</a> - Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty - Punishment for criminal ,intimidation - Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace · <a href=1454>Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961</a>, <a href=1454-3>Section 3</a>, <a href=1454-4>Section 4</a> - Penalty for giving or taking dowry - Penalty for demanding dowry
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
376 of 2017
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 141 words
1.

Petitioners have approached this Court seeking the following reliefs:

"I. A writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned F.I.R. of Case Crime No. 22/2017 U/s 498-A, 354A, 504, 506 I.P.C . and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Kotwali Ranipur District Haridwar. (Contained as Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition).

II. a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No. 1 & 2 not to harass the petitioner in view of the impugned F.I.R. till the collection of any credible evidence against the petitioner and till the filing of the charge sheet."

2.

Learned Deputy Advocate General for the State submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed in the matter.

3.

In view of the above, this criminal writ petition has rendered infructuous and the same is dismissed as such.