High CourtsSingle Bench

Arunabh Dave And O rs vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 18 April 2018 · Citation: (2018) 04 CHH CK 0217

HON’BLE JUDGES
SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 363, 366A, 376 · Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 4
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Misc. Criminal Case No.1126 of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 257 words
1.

The accused/applicant has moved this bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for releasing him on regular bail

during trial in connection with Crime No.29/2017, registered at Police Station Darri, Distt. Korba, for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 366-

A, 376 of the IPC and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

2.

Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the applicant abducted the minor prosecutrix and committed sexual intercourse with her and thereby

committed the offence.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has not committed any offence and he has been falsely implicated in the case. The

prosecutrix is major and the applicant has also married the prosecutrix and charge-sheet has already been filed. The applicant is in jail since 16-9-2017

and no useful purpose will be served by keeping him in jail.

4.

On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the application and submits that the prosecutrix is minor on the date of offence and there are

number of documents available on record to demonstrate that she was minor on the date of offence.

5.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.

6.

Taking into consideration the nature and gravity of offence, facts and circumstances of the case and age of the prosecutrix who appears to be

minor on the date of offence, I do not find any ground for grant of bail to the applicant. The application is, therefore, rejected.