High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 03 MAD CK 0564

Arunagiri vs The Commissioner, The Assistant Commissioner, North Zone and The Assistant Commissioner (Revenue), Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation

Madras High Court · Decided on 23 March 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. Jaichandren, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 6151 of 2011 and M.P. No. 1 of 2011

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 184 words

M. Jaichandren, J.—Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and the learned Counsel appearing on behalf the Respondents.

2.

At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the first Respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 15.02.2010, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period.

3.

The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court.

4.

In view of the submissions made by the learned Counsels appearing on either side, the first Respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 15.02.2010, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation dated 15.02.2010, to the second Respondent along with a copy of this order.

5.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.