AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
22 paragraphs · 437 wordsThese Civil Revision Petitions have been filed seeking a direction to the District Judge, Ramanathapuram, to dispose of the execution
proceedings, within a stipulated time as fixed by this Court.
Since the issue involved in all these Civil Revision Petitions is one and the same, these Civil Revision petitions are taken up together for hearing
and are being disposed of by this common order.
The petitioner is the plaintiff in the suits and he filed the suits for the relief of ejectment and for recovery of damages for the use and occupation
of the buildings and the same were allowed, against which, the respondent has filed first appeals on the file of Sub Court, Ramanathapuram and the
same were also dismissed. Aggrieved over the same, second appeals were preferred by the respondents, before this Court and the same were
also dismissed. Thereafter, the petitioner has filed the execution petitions, but, the respondent has not come forward to contest the same and in
order to drag on the proceedings, without any valid reason, has sought for several adjournments and therefore, the petitioner has filed the present
petitions seeking early disposal of the same.
Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.
The prayer in these petitions itself is with a limited scope for speedy disposal of the execution petitions and therefore, no notice is necessary to
the respondent.
Considering the facts and circumstances of these cases, this Court is of the view that ends of justice would be met, if a direction is issued to the
trial Court, for speedy disposal of the said execution proceedings. Accordingly, having regard to the submissions made by the learned Counsel for
the petitioner and also taking into consideration the limited scope of the prayer sought for by the petitioner, this Court, without expressing any
opinion with regard to the merits of the case, directs the learned District Judge, Ramanathapuram, to dispose of the execution proceedings in
E.P.No.14 of 2017 in O.S.No.48 of 2012, E.P.No.15 of 2017 in O.S.No.50 of 2012, E.P.No.16 of 2017 in O.S.No. 51 of 2012, E.P.No.17
of 2017 in O.S.No.54 of 2012, E.P.No.19 of 2017 in O.S.No.57 of 2012, E.P.No.20 of 2017 in O.S.No.67 of 2012, E.P.No. 21 of 2017 in
O.S.No.68 of 2012 and E.P.No.22 of 2017 in O.S.No.56 of 2012, on merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the
date of receipt of a copy of this order.
With the above direction, these Civil Revision Petitions are disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
