High CourtsSingle Bench

Ashfak vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 18 January 2021 · Citation: (2021) 01 RAJ CK 0223

HON’BLE JUDGES
Narendra Singh Dhaddha, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 323, 341, 354, 354(ka), 354(gha)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15517 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 253 words

The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.354/2020 registered at Police Station Shastri Nagar,

Jaipur City (North) for the offence(s) under Sections 323, 341, 354, 354(ka), 354 (gha), 504, 506, 509 and 34 of IPC.

On consideration of submissions made on behalf of the respective parties and the material made available for my perusal as well as the evidence

collected during investigation, which has been produced before me by way of case diary but without expressing any final opinion on the merit and de-

merit of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused- petitioner.

Consequently, the application for anticipatory bail is allowed. The SHO/IO/Arresting Authority, Police Station Shastri Nagar, Jaipur City (North) in

FIR No.354/2020 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner Ashfak S/o Sh. Abdul Wahid he shall be released on bail, provided he

furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to his satisfaction on the following conditions :-

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as

to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.