Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench

Ashfeenajan vs Union Territory Of Jammu And Kashmir & Others

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 30 April 2022 · Citation: (2022) 04 CAT CK 0052

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anand Mathur, Member (A) · D.S. Mahra, Member (J)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No. 390 Of 2022

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 205 words

Anand Mathur, Member (A)

1.

Mr. Sheikh Mustaq, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Hakim Aman Ali, learned counsel for the respondents are present.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant is aggrieved of non extension of inter-district transfer made qua the applicant on account of security reasons. Therefore, learned counsel for the applicant pleads for consideration of pending representation of the applicant dated 10.04.2022 whereby the applicant seeks permission from the respondents to perform her duties at the present place of posting.

3.

He further submits that the applicant will be satisfied if the respondents are directed to decide the pending representation of the applicant by passing a Speaking order in a time bound manner.

4.

In view of the limited payer made by learned counsel for the applicant, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this OA pending. Hence, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the instant OA is disposed off with the direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider representation of the applicant dated 10.04.2022 by passing a Reasoned and Speaking order within a period of four weeks from today. The order so passed shall be communicated to the applicant forthwith.

5.

No costs.