High CourtsSingle Bench

Ashok @ Bittu And Another vs State Of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 2 March 2020 · Citation: (2020) 03 P&H CK 0008

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 147, 149, 323, 342, 365, 377, 506, 509 · Scheduled Castes And Scheduled Tribes (Prevention Of. Atrocities) Act, 1989 — Section 3(1)4, 3(1)(a), 3(1)(d), , 3(1)s, 3(1)z, 3(2)(va)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Main No. 53684, 53687, 54059 Of 2019 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 467 words

Arvind Singh Sangwan, J

Prayer in these three petitions is for grant of regular bail to petitioners Ashok @ Bittu, Nirdosh, Sanjeev @ Patel and Deepak, in FIR No.894 dated

21.08.2019 under Sections 147, 149, 323, 342, 365, 377, 506, 509 IPC, Section 67 of I.T. Act, 2008 and Sections 3(1)(a), 3(1)(d), 3(1)4, 3(1)s, 3(1)z,

3(2)(va) of SC&ST Act, 1989, registered at Police Station Sadar Karnal, District Karnal.

Learned counsel for petitioners Ashok @ Bittu and Nirdosh submits that both the petitioners are brothers and wife of petitioner Ashok @ Bittu namely

Krishma Devi has allegedly ran away with the complainant. It is further submitted that both the petitioners are in judicial custody for the last more than

six months; investigation is complete and they are not involved in any other case.

Learned counsel for petitioners Sanjeev @ Patel and Deepak has submitted that they are co-villagers of the complainant and are also in custody for

the last more than 06 months and 10 days. Learned counsel has referred to allegations in the FIR, wherein it is stated that accused persons have

removed pant of the complainant with an intent to kill him and inserted an iron rod in his anus and thereafter, they blackened his face as well as face

of Karishma Devi and put shoe garland in their neck and made them to take a round in the village.

Learned counsel further referred to MLR of the complainant that there is no such corresponding injury in the MLR regarding forcible insertion of iron

rod in anus of the complainant. It is further submitted that the complainant has already entered into a compromise with one of the accused Akshay and

in view of the compromise, co-accused Akshay has already been granted the concession of regular bail by this Court vide order dated 10.02.2020

passed in CRM-M-48-2020.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Ajaib Singh and assisted by learned counsel for the complainant, has not disputed the factual position.

It is also not disputed that the medical evidence do not support the allegations levelled in the FIR.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Ajaib Singh, has submitted that wife of petitioner Ashok @ Bittu i.e. Karishma Devi and complainant

Sunil are still residing together, as she has left the company of petitioner Ashok @ Bittu. It is further submitted that investigation is complete; challan

stands presented and charges have been framed.

Without commenting anything on merits of the case, considering the aforesaid submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, all these three

petitions are allowed and petitioners Ashok @ Bittu, Nirdosh, Sanjeev @ Patel and Deepak are directed to be released on regular bail subject to

furnishing their bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, concerned.

Petitions stand disposed of.