High CourtsSingle Bench

Ashok Jha And Ors vs State Of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 7 January 2020 · Citation: (2020) 01 PAT CK 0118

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 323, 324, 326, 341, 379, 504, 506 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 83069 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 367 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he would not press the application on behalf of petitioner no. 1. Accordingly, the application on

behalf of petitioner no. 1 stands withdrawn.

3.

The petitioners no. 2 and 3 apprehend arrest in connection with Parbatta PS Case No. 294 of 2019 dated 01.08.2019 instituted under Sections 341,

323, 324, 326, 379, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

4.

The allegation against the petitioners is of assault on the informant, her husband and son and specifically against petitioner no. 1 of inflicting farsa

blow on the head of the husband of the informant.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioners no. 2 and 3 submitted that the parties are agnates and there is family dispute between them. It was submitted

that the petitioner no. 1 has also filed Parbatta PS Case No. 295 of 2019 on 01.08.2019 for the same offence. It was submitted that there was some

scuffle between both the sides and further that no injury report has been enclosed. Learned counsel submitted that against petitioners no. 2 and 3, the

allegation is general and omnibus, though only against petitioner no. 1, there is specific allegation of inflicting farsa blow on the head of the husband of

the informant.

6.

Learned APP submitted that the petitioners no. 2 and 3 also having assaulted the informant, her husabnd and son do not deserve the privilege of

anticipatory bail.

7.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender

before the Court below within four weeks from today, the petitioners no. 2 and 3 namely, Surya Narayan Jha and Manisha Devi, be released on bail

upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1st, Khagaria in Parbatta PS Case No. 294 of 2019, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

8.

The application stands disposed off in the aforementioned terms.