AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
20 paragraphs · 367 wordsHeard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he would not press the application on behalf of petitioner no. 1. Accordingly, the application on
behalf of petitioner no. 1 stands withdrawn.
The petitioners no. 2 and 3 apprehend arrest in connection with Parbatta PS Case No. 294 of 2019 dated 01.08.2019 instituted under Sections 341,
323, 324, 326, 379, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The allegation against the petitioners is of assault on the informant, her husband and son and specifically against petitioner no. 1 of inflicting farsa
blow on the head of the husband of the informant.
Learned counsel for the petitioners no. 2 and 3 submitted that the parties are agnates and there is family dispute between them. It was submitted
that the petitioner no. 1 has also filed Parbatta PS Case No. 295 of 2019 on 01.08.2019 for the same offence. It was submitted that there was some
scuffle between both the sides and further that no injury report has been enclosed. Learned counsel submitted that against petitioners no. 2 and 3, the
allegation is general and omnibus, though only against petitioner no. 1, there is specific allegation of inflicting farsa blow on the head of the husband of
the informant.
Learned APP submitted that the petitioners no. 2 and 3 also having assaulted the informant, her husabnd and son do not deserve the privilege of
anticipatory bail.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender
before the Court below within four weeks from today, the petitioners no. 2 and 3 namely, Surya Narayan Jha and Manisha Devi, be released on bail
upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1st, Khagaria in Parbatta PS Case No. 294 of 2019, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
The application stands disposed off in the aforementioned terms.
