High CourtsSingle Bench

Ashok Kumar And Others vs State

Madras High Court · Decided on 18 December 2025 · Citation: (2025) 12 MAD CK 1928

HON’BLE JUDGES
K. Rajasekar, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Section 109(1), 118(1), 191(2), 191(3), 269, 296(b), 351(3)
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Original Petition No. 34479 Of 2025
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 477 words

K.Rajasekar, J

1.

The petitioners who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 20.11.2025 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 118(1), 109(1) and 351(3) of BNS, in Crime No.282 of 2025, seeks bail.

2.

The allegation against the petitioners is that due to previous enmity, the petitioners joined hands with other 8 accused and attacked the defacto complainant with a knife, causing severe injuries. Hence, the complaint was lodged and the petitioners were arrested.

3.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are in judicial custody since 20.11.2025. He further submitted that the co-accused was released on bail by this Court. Hence, he prayed to grant bail to the petitioner.

4.

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that there are nine accused in this case and the petitioners are ranked as A3 and A7. The petitioner/A3, Ashok Kumar is having three previous cases and the petitioner/A7, Vignesh is having one previous case pending against them and that investigation is still pending. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5.

Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, the fact that the co-accused was released on bail by this Court in Crl.OP.Nos.33215 & 34228 of 2025 dated 04.12.2025 & 15.12.2025, though the petitioners are having previous cases and taking into account the period of their incarceration, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners on certain conditions.

7.

Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on her executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) each with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Vellore, and on further conditions that:-

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.