High CourtsSingle Bench

Ashok Kumar Saini vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 8 January 2021 · Citation: (2021) 01 RAJ CK 0270

HON’BLE JUDGES
Narendra Singh Dhaddha, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 149, 380, 406, 420, 453, 457
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15511 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 300 words
1.

The present anticipatory bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.199/2019 registered at Police Station

Chomu, District Jaipur for the offence(s) under Sections 457, 380, 420, 406, 453, 149 of IPC.

2.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that name of the petitioner is not mentioned in the FIR. Co-accused Chandra Prakash Saini and Ajay Saini have

already been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and his case is similar to that of co-accused persons. Nothing is to be recovered

from the petitioner.

3.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the anticipatory bail application.

4.

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without

expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.

5.

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Chomu, District Jaipur in FIR No.199/2019

is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner Ashok Kumar Saini S/o Surajmal Saini, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a

personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the

concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as

to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.