High CourtsDivision Bench

Ashok Kumar Sharma vs Official Liquidator under the Company Act and Tech Invest (India) Pvt. Ltd.

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 30 August 2010 · Citation: (2010) 08 UK CK 0138

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prafulla C. Pant, J · Nirmal Yadav, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Company Appeal No. 01 of 2010

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 226 words
1.

Heard.

2.

This appeal is directed against order dated 28.07.2010 passed by respondent No. 1 (official liquidator) communication vide letter No. OL/Tech Invest (India) P. Ltd/rejection 5229 dated 28.07.2010 whereby the said authority has rejected the petition filed by the appellant Ashok Kumar Sharma on the following grounds:

(i) Non-submission of information and documents relating to claim affidavit.

(ii) Not on proper affidavit.

3.

Learned Counsel for the appellant submitted that appellant is workman who had claimed his dues payable to him by Company i.e. Tech Invest (India) Pvt. Ltd. under liquidation. It is argued that respondent No. 1 has rejected the claim petition without giving any opportunity to the appellant to remove the defects pointed out in the impugned order.

4.

Having considered the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, this appeal preferred under Rule 164 of Company (Court) Rules, 1959 is disposed of with the direction that the appellant Ashok Kumar Sharma is allowed to remove the defects, pointed out in the impugned order by respondent No. 1, within a period of one month from today whereafter respondent may pass an appropriate orders on the affidavit/claim filed by the present appellant before the said authority. In case, appellant fails to remove the defects within time allowed by this Court, the appeal shall stand dismissed.