AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
25 paragraphs · 503 wordsRajendra Chandra Singh Samant, J
Heard on application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
This is the first bail application filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicants who
are apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No. 74 of 2020, registered at Police Station - Kamleshwarpur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh for the
offence punishable under Sections 294, 506B, 323, 147 and 452 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is submitted by counsel for the applicants that they have been falsely implicated in this case. No case is made out against the applicants on the
basis of the material placed before the Court by the prosecution. The applicants have not committed any offence. Apart from that, only the offence
under Section 452 of the IPC is non-bailable, whereas, the rest of the offences registered against the applicants are bailable in nature. The dispute
arose due to the motor accident caused by the son of the complainant. Hence, it is prayed that the applicants be benefited with grant of anticipatory
bail.
Learned State counsel opposes the bail application and the submissions made in this respect. It is submitted that looking to the material present in
the investigation diary, the applicants are not entitled for grant of anticipatory bail.
Heard counsel for both the parties and perused the case diary.
According to the prosecution case, on the date and time of the incident, all these applicants made forceful entry in the house of the complainant who
then abused, threatened, assaulted and caused simple injuries to the complainant and others after forming unlawful assembly.
Considered the submissions. Taking into consideration the reason of dispute between the complainant and the applicants and also the other reasons,
I am of the considered view that the present is a fit case where the applicants should be benefited with grant of anticipatory bail.
Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicants in connection with the aforesaid
offence, they shall be released on bail by the Officer arresting them on executing a personal bond in sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum
to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer. They shall also abide by the following conditions:
'(i) that the applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation before the Investigating Officer as and when required;
(ii) that the applicants shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as
to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;
(iii) that the applicants shall not act, in any manner, which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial; and
(iv) that the applicants shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to them by the said Court till disposal of the trial.'
