High CourtsSingle Bench

Ashu vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 16 February 2024 · Citation: (2024) 02 UK CK 0022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Kumar Verma, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 2(viia), 2(xxiiia), 8, 21, 50, 60
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 263 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 321 words

Alok Kumar Verma, J

1.

This Application has been filed for grant of regular bail in connection with the Case Crime No.403 of 2023, registered at police station Doiwala, District Dehradun.

2.

The present applicant is in judicial custody under Section 8/21/60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short, “Act, 1985”).

3.

According to the First Information Report, on 30.12.2023, police party recovered 102 grams Smack (Heroin) from the personal search of the present applicant.

4.

Heard Ms. Divya Jain, learned counsel with Ms. Shweta Jain, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned Brief Holder for the State.

5.

Ms. Divya Jain, Advocate, contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present matter. The alleged recovery was planted. The mandatory provisions of Section 50 of the Act were not followed. Applicant does not have any criminal antecedents. He is in custody since 30.12.2023, and, he is a permanent resident of District Dehradun, therefore, there is no chance of his absconding.

6.

Learned counsel for the State has opposed the bail application orally.

7.

As per the Table prepared under Section 2 (xxiii-a) and Section 2 (vii-a) of the Act, 1985, lesser than 5 grams of Smack (Heroin) is small quantity and greater than 250 grams of Smack is commercial quantity (Entry No.56).

8.

Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case, no reason is found to keep the applicant behind the bars for an indefinite period, therefore, without expressing any opinion as to the merit of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage.

9.

The Bail Application is allowed.

10.

Let the applicant – Ashu be released on bail on executing his personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.