High CourtsSingle Bench

Asit Biswas vs State Of West Bengal

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 17 January 2022 · Citation: (2022) 01 CAL CK 0038

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jay Sengupta, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 21
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision No. 2664 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 340 words

This is an application seeking an expeditious disposal of a proceeding in which a charge sheet was submitted under section 21 of the NDPS Act.

Mr. Pratick Bose learned counsel who ordinarily appears on behalf of the State is requested to appear in this matter. His engagement may be

regularised by the competent authority of the State in due course. The Petitioner is directed to serve a copy of the revisional application upon him.

Mr. Chakraborty, Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits as follows. The petitioner is an accused in this case. He was arrested

on 18.12.2019 the date on which the F.I.R. was lodged. The first charge sheet was taken cognizance of on 12.06.2020. The second charge sheet was

submitted on 14.07.2021. In all, nine witnesses are proposed to be examined by the prosecution as per charge sheet. Although the charge was framed

on 24.11.2021, till date evidence could not commence. Dates have been fixed for evidence in the month of February 2022. The matter has remained

pending for no fault on the part of the petitioner.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State, in his usual fairness, submits that State would not come in the way if a direction is passed for an

expeditious disposal of the proceeding.

I have heard the submissions of the learned counsels for the appearing for the petitioner and the State and have perused the revision petition.

It appears that some delay has been occasioned in concluding the proceeding, especially considering the fact that the petitioner is languishing in jail

since 18.12.2019.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the learned Trial Court is requested to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible without granting

any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties, preferably within eight months from the resumption of normal functioning of the Court.

With these observations, the revisional application is disposed of.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon completion of requisite formalities.